Oh they're VERY active, in being the home office of Progressive IslamoLeftism and its PR wing of "As a Jews" who instantly publish any smear about Israel and work tirelessly to paint it as a heartless military machine while also making sure to erase all Palestinian deeds, statements, agency, responsibility, history etc. They are just poor brown indigenous oppressed victims who want grandpa's farm back! If only Israel were nicer maybe they'd commit fewer massacres!
The very active "As a Jews" never stop actively broadcasting their moral and intellectual superiority over those OTHER backwards Jews who prize faith, family and nation, when everyone knows the Right Side of History demands we all become universalist egalitarians who always turn the other cheek—but Jews first!
Progressive aristocrats always expect other people to bleed and die for their supposed morals and ideological fetishes. If those kids at the Nova Festival had been smarter, they'd have been on an Ivy League campus and not antagonizing Gazans with their joy and freedom. The NYT is the home of actively malevolent "As a Jews" who've broadcast all sorts of lies about Israel and run cover for all sorts of Jew haters. If only they were a little less active!
A post on X adds English subtitles: https://x.com/MaxNordau/status/2074923996198375928. What is well translated as "Bibi Derangement Syndrome" is a Hebrew name for the syndrome derived from the acronym for "Just not Bibi".
From the river to the sea. Inactive Jews may roam free.
Charitably speaking, Joe Kahn doesn’t spend a lot of time at temple. At least I hope that’s what he means. Because I doubt the Nazis, and their modern day keepers of the toxic flame, would buy the opt out strategy.
“So, you’re and inactive jew. Ok. Here’s a green star. You’ll be fine.
Wonder about that. They were big fans of Stalin. Never retracted Duranty's denial of the Holodomor and has desperately clung to the Pulitzer it won. And lets not forget it's article about why woman have better sex under socialism.
Not a big NYT fan and even less any of their columnists. But still the... "his father fought on the Nazi side..." line is uncalled for. Since when is it permissible to judge a son by the sins of the father? It undercuts your argument against Kristoff and smacks of. a petty and cheap shot taken for its own sake. Ugh!
There is an old saw about judging a man not on his words but on his actions. Ironic with Kristoff that his words are his actions. Still....the Father was a Nazi link smacks of Blood libel for one thing. Judge him by himself not his parentage or his heritage. Seems un-American to me.
Assuming you aren't referring to the Rugby team it falls into the category of stolen land acknowledgments, i.e. no I'm not giving mine back. As long as the reparations are paid by someone who isn't them they are down for it. I propose that everyone who is Black or identifies as Black should get a free lifetimes subscription to the NYT, both digital and paper. Seems fair.
“I’m not an active Jew.”
Oh they're VERY active, in being the home office of Progressive IslamoLeftism and its PR wing of "As a Jews" who instantly publish any smear about Israel and work tirelessly to paint it as a heartless military machine while also making sure to erase all Palestinian deeds, statements, agency, responsibility, history etc. They are just poor brown indigenous oppressed victims who want grandpa's farm back! If only Israel were nicer maybe they'd commit fewer massacres!
The very active "As a Jews" never stop actively broadcasting their moral and intellectual superiority over those OTHER backwards Jews who prize faith, family and nation, when everyone knows the Right Side of History demands we all become universalist egalitarians who always turn the other cheek—but Jews first!
Progressive aristocrats always expect other people to bleed and die for their supposed morals and ideological fetishes. If those kids at the Nova Festival had been smarter, they'd have been on an Ivy League campus and not antagonizing Gazans with their joy and freedom. The NYT is the home of actively malevolent "As a Jews" who've broadcast all sorts of lies about Israel and run cover for all sorts of Jew haters. If only they were a little less active!
No doubt. A little less NYT activity would be a welcome adjustment.
Israelis are countering this. See "‘Dr. Bibi’: Netanyahu copies Trump with satirical AI video mocking media critics". https://www.timesofisrael.com/liveblog_entry/dr-bibi-netanyahu-copies-trump-with-satirical-ai-video-mocking-media-critics/
A post on X adds English subtitles: https://x.com/MaxNordau/status/2074923996198375928. What is well translated as "Bibi Derangement Syndrome" is a Hebrew name for the syndrome derived from the acronym for "Just not Bibi".
How about a retraction... for a nonsensical piece that was fed to Kristoff by Hamas operatives. All the news that is UNFIT to print.
Yuck. The New York Times and everyone who still works there is culpable for a media war on Jews.
Yep, wouldn't have run it - but they did.
The New York Time is not exactly a beacon of truth!
The NYT has not been - for some time now - ‘all the news that is fit to print’. It is simply a communication vehicle for leftists who despise America.
“…not an active Jew”!
Will that work?
Imagine the possibilities:
Updated Hamas chant:
From the river to the sea. Inactive Jews may roam free.
Charitably speaking, Joe Kahn doesn’t spend a lot of time at temple. At least I hope that’s what he means. Because I doubt the Nazis, and their modern day keepers of the toxic flame, would buy the opt out strategy.
“So, you’re and inactive jew. Ok. Here’s a green star. You’ll be fine.
A new poll sheds light on the implications of Joe Kahn being an inactive Jew:
https://www.timesofisrael.com/liveblog_entry/new-poll-reveals-sharp-differences-on-israel-between-religious-secular-us-jews/
Headline: New poll reveals sharp differences on Israel between religious, secular US Jews
It is truly sad that a newspaper that historically has been held in such high esteem has been high jacked by left winged extremists.
Wonder about that. They were big fans of Stalin. Never retracted Duranty's denial of the Holodomor and has desperately clung to the Pulitzer it won. And lets not forget it's article about why woman have better sex under socialism.
Not a big NYT fan and even less any of their columnists. But still the... "his father fought on the Nazi side..." line is uncalled for. Since when is it permissible to judge a son by the sins of the father? It undercuts your argument against Kristoff and smacks of. a petty and cheap shot taken for its own sake. Ugh!
I don’t know. The father was a Nazi. The son is adjacent to and supportive of hamas Nazis. Like father like son. Like democrat party has always been
There is an old saw about judging a man not on his words but on his actions. Ironic with Kristoff that his words are his actions. Still....the Father was a Nazi link smacks of Blood libel for one thing. Judge him by himself not his parentage or his heritage. Seems un-American to me.
Ask the Blacks about reparations
Assuming you aren't referring to the Rugby team it falls into the category of stolen land acknowledgments, i.e. no I'm not giving mine back. As long as the reparations are paid by someone who isn't them they are down for it. I propose that everyone who is Black or identifies as Black should get a free lifetimes subscription to the NYT, both digital and paper. Seems fair.
And we don’t believe Kristof’s column because why exactly?
The Israeli Supreme Court (!) is now dealing with apparent attempts to starve a Palestinian prisoner—and Bibi is refusing to comply.